Friday, October 14, 2005

Doin the Bartman

Check this out--Interesting piece on the Cubs most infamous fan.

Wednesday, October 12, 2005 Division Series Predictions

Baseball Playoffs First Round Results beat the predictions of 25 out of 26 experts for the first round of the baseball playoffs! Congratulations to Steve Phillips, from ESPN - he was the only expert among those who published predictions at,, CBS, and to have beaten the simulation.

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

TMQ Today

The Browns got the "Sweet N' Sour Play" of the week on Tuesday Morning Quarterback on
Sweet 'N' Sour Play: Trailing 10-6 with 3:01 remaining, the Cleveland Browns (3.0b) had first-and-10 on the Chicago 33. The Browns called a "max protect" play on which eight blocked and only two receivers ran routes; Antonio Bryant got deep on the left side for the touchdown that gave Cleveland its winning points. Yours truly watched the tape of this play several times in rapt fascination. First, because eight are blocking five pass rushers, nobody ever gets near quarterback Trent Dilfer -- the Bears' defensive line is a good seven yards from Dilfer as he waits for Bryant to shake his man. Second, Bryant only has one man to shake because he's single-covered. With five Bears rushing the passer and the rest dropping into coverage, six defenders were available to cover just two receivers; yet Bryant, going deep, was single-covered. Where were all the rest of the Chicago defenders? A sweet play for Cleveland, very sour for Chicago.

"Lots of Potential???"

Wow, A-Rod goes ironic...what a quote..."This team has a lot of potential, and we'll be back."

Usually with multiple hall of famers and $200 Million in payroll, potential is not what you are touting.

By the way, did anyone else not realize that Mike Mussina made $19 mill this year??

Braylon's elbow

Eight weeks maybe?! Well at least they won on Sunday..

Edwards still hospitalized with infection

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Mary Kay Cabot
Plain Dealer Reporter

Browns receiver Braylon Edwards remains hospitalized after undergoing surgery Saturday to excise an infection in his right arm, and the Browns are awaiting test results to determine how long he'll be out.

ESPN's Chris Mortensen reported the Browns' top pick could be out eight weeks, but Edwards' dad, Stan, said Monday he doesn't know if that's true. Braylon Edwards is expected to miss Sunday's game in Baltimore and perhaps a few more weeks depending on the severity of the infection.

"We're waiting for results of the culture, hopefully by [today], and then we'll have a better idea what type of treatment he'll need, and how long he'll be out," Stan Edwards said. "But he was getting antsy [Monday], and he was up in his room, working on his footwork."

Coach Romeo Crennel said he had no idea how much time Edwards will miss.

"I imagine that might depend on what kind of infection it was," Crennel said. "If it's a major infection, he might be out longer. If it's a minor infection, he won't be out as long."

As of Monday, it still was not known if Edwards had a staph infection, the same thing that recently caused tight end Kellen Winslow Jr. to lose about 30 pounds. The receiver is being treated with antibiotics intravenously.

Crennel said he hoped team physician Dr. Anthony Miniaci would be able to give him "some kind of timetable [on Monday] as far as when Braylon may or may not be back. . . . We feel like he's going to be back and he'll be able to help us."

Crennel was not available after his meeting with the doctor.

Stan Edwards said he was with his son at the Clinic on Saturday and Braylon was getting down about the setback.

"I had a long talk with him about not wasting any emotion on something he can't control," Stan Edwards said.

Stan Edwards said the infectious disease specialist told him that the infection "was very serious, but that there's a 99.9 percent chance they got it all. He's very lucky."

He said the specialist told him that the surgeon would have a better idea how long the receiver will be out. Stan Edwards said he couldn't see the incision because Braylon Edwards had a bandage "going from the middle of his biceps down to his fingers."

Stan Edwards said he knows such an infection can take a toll on the body and that his son will lose some weight. Before the infection, the receiver already was concerned about keeping his weight up.

Browns linebacker Ben Taylor knows all about it. He suffered a staph infection late in the 2003 season and missed two games. He returned for the final four outings but never was the same, relegated mostly to special teams.

"I was in the hospital for six days, and I lost 10 pounds," Taylor said. "It was rough. I felt sick all over. I felt like I had the flu, and my joints hurt."

Taylor said he heard a report that Braylon Edwards' ordeal may have begun with an infected hair, "but believe me. It's a lot more serious than what they made it out to be."

Taylor said when his occurred, he woke up in the middle of the night and then made it through two hours of team meetings the next morning before "my body just kind of shut down. I had a 99 degree temperature when I was here, and by the time I got to the Clinic, it was 103. It can hit you that quick, and I know that's what happened [with Braylon]."

Taylor said his infection began in a little scratch, not even an inch long. It set him back for the rest of the season. The good news for Edwards is that his came at the beginning of the season.

"When you lose 10 pounds like that in the middle of the season, it's kind of hard to come back from," Taylor said. "After that, I didn't start any games. I played special teams, but I was kind of down from it. It strains you."

Quarterback Trent Dilfer visited Edwards at the Clinic on Sunday night and said he was in good spirits. As far as him possibly missing some games, Dilfer said, "It's disappointing, but I really don't know what's going on. This is a challenge for him. It will help grow him up a little bit. It will make things a little bit harder on me, but that's life."

Crennel said Edwards wasn't being treated for the sore before Saturday because he thought it was nothing. He was, however, wearing a protective sleeve to keep him from scratching it. The arm was swollen during Saturday's 11 a.m. walk-through, but shortly thereafter, it blew up to about the size of a baseball.

The Browns didn't report Edwards' injury to the NFL office because Crennel said he believed he only had to do so on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. The league office said the matter is under review.

Friday, October 7, 2005

If everyone kicks in $500....

We can get 100 of my bobblehead---for your small investment you will get 2 originals to KEEP!

Kyle Orton's Off Week...

Wow, it's good to see what Kyle Orton does on his bye week...hopefully the hangover lasts a week or so...

Tuesday, October 4, 2005

How Far They Fell

Just last Sunday, September 25, the Playoff Odds Report said that the Cleveland Indians made the playoffs in 96.5% of its million runs.

Yesterday, it came became apparent that we were living in one of those 35,000 worlds where the Indians did not make the playoffs, despite having the advantages of playing at home, with four games left against the two worst teams in the American League, while their chief opponents were going to play each other and hopefully knock each other off. Seven agonizing days later, losing six of seven games by a combined total of seven runs, the Tribe gets to spend a winter in pained remembrance.

Yet they have this consolation: the Odds Report doesn't think they blew the best chance of all time, in terms of having a playoff spot right there and then letting it slip away. Since 1901, there have been 320 races for the Odds Report to analyze: two races every year from 1901 to 1968, four a year from 1969 to 1993, and eight a year since 1995. (I've decided to simply leave 1981 and 1994 out of the discussion.) Given that many races, you'd expect to have somewhere between five and 11 teams who reached the upper 90s and then missed out on the playoffs, and in fact there are seven teams who have fared worse than this year's Indians.

For all of these teams, I ran the historical version of the Playoff Odds report, just as I did for the 1964 Phillies. This means ten thousand computer seasons, not a million, and running every season from August 1 to the end of the year. The infamous seven, in chronological order:

  • Sept. 6, 1934: With 24 days left in the season, the New York Giants held a seven-game lead over the second-place St. Louis Cardinals, 85-47 to their 77-53. Seventeen of their final 21 games were scheduled for the Polo Grounds, while the Cardinals were facing 17 of their final 23 games on the road. That has a lot to do with why the Odds Report gave the Giants a 98.8% chance at winning the pennant. They lost to the Cubs that afternoon, then split a four-game series with the Pirates while the Cardinals were taking four of six from the Phillies. The Cards now trailed by 5 1/2, and they played four against each other. The Cardinals won three of the games to close the gap to 3 1/2. After another week the Giants still held a 2 1/2-game lead, 93-56 to the Cards' 89-57, with just four games left for them to play. They lost those four games, all at home, two to the Phillies (who finished the year 56-93) and two to the Dodgers (who finished 71-81); meanwhile, the Cardinals beat the Cubs, split a pair with the Pirates, then swept the last-place Reds at home. By going 18-5 down the stretch, including a 6-1 final week, they beat the Giants (8-13 after Sept. 6, 0-4 in the last week) by two games.

  • August 15, 1942: The Brooklyn Dodgers are 79-33, 9 1/2 games ahead of the second-place Cardinals. The Odds Report sees the Dodgers and Cardinals as essentially equal teams, giving dem Bums a .635 third-order winning percentage to .625 for the Cardinals; the fact that they were virtually even meant that the Dodgers' lead would be very difficult to overcome: 96.9% in the Dodgers' favor, to be precise. The Dodgers didn't play badly the rest of the season, coming home at 25-17, but the '42 Cardinals had one of the greatest closing kicks ever. They won their next three games over the Reds, took a pair from the Cubs, three of four from the Pirates, three of four from the Dodgers, swept the Phillies and Braves in three apiece, then split a pair with the Giants to wrap up a 19-3 homestand that closed the gap to 4 1/2 games...and the Dodgers, at this point, were still 95.5% favorites. The Cardinals then hit the road and took three from Cincinnati, split a pair in Pittsburgh, beat the Giants once and the Dodgers twice, which pulled them into a tie. But they weren't done, going on to take three of four in Philly, two from Boston and split a pair with the Cubs to finish off a 13-3 road trip. By now they controlled the odds, and they wrapped things up by sweeping pairs of games at home with the Pirates, Reds and Cubs, completing an amazing 38-6 finish to beat the Dodgers by two games.

  • August 13, 1951: The Brooklyn Dodgers are once again in first place, this time holding a 12 1/2-game over the Giants. The Odds Report makes them a 99.7% favorite to go on to win the NL, but it doesn't work out so well. As in 1942, it isn't so much what they didn't do as what their opponents did. The Giants were coming off three straight wins against the Phillies; they proceeded to take three straight from the Dodgers, then three more from the Phils, two from the Reds, one from St. Louis and four from the Cubs to complete a 16-game winning streak. Following a rather pedestrian run in which they went 9-6 (including taking three of four from Brooklyn), it was now September 13, and the Dodgers still had a six-game lead and a 97.6% chance of winning. Until the regular season ended on September 30, though, the Giants lost just one more game, going on a 12-1 tear to force a tie, and a best-of three playoff, with the Dodgers. The Giants won the first game, the Dodgers won the second, and the Giants won it all on Bobby Thomson's three-run, ninth-inning homer in the third game. The Giants win the pennant, indeed.

  • August 7, 1969: Two-and-a-half weeks after Neil Armstrong walked on the moon, the Chicago Cubs were mooning over the NL East, holding a nine-game lead over the second-place Mets. At 71-41, they had the best record in the National league, although the Orioles were better in the AL. They won the league 98.0% of the time in the simulations, but objective computer simulations, by their very nature, know nothing about Miracles. The Mets got hot and the Cubs went cold, so much so after the Mets swept a doubleheader from the Expos on Sept. 10 they took over the division lead both in record (84-57 to 84-59) and in chances (51.6%-47.8%). The Mets stayed hot, finishing the year on a 41-15 run that left the Cubs eight games behind at season's end. As the Braves and Orioles were to find out, the Mets' hot streak didn't end with the regular season.

  • August 10, 1983: The Atlanta Braves hold a 6 1/2-game lead over the Dodgers in the National League West. At 69-45, they had the best record in baseball, and at .589, the best third-order winning percentage. The simulator made them the winner 96.6% of the time. They couldn't hold the lead until the end of the month, much less the end of the season, going 7-12 over the remainder of August while the Dodgers went a resounding 16-5. The Dodgers took the odds lead on Sept. 2, gave it back for a day on the sixth, but thereafter ran away from the Braves, who went 12-17 in September.

  • August 7, 1993: Ten years later, it was the Braves' turn to be the spoiler. The San Francisco Giants were 9 1/2 games ahead of Atlanta, and the odds report reached 98.1% in their favor, but the Braves were bout to make a dazzling run. Starting with a win over the Expos on the eighth, the Braves won nine straight games, then lost a pair before running off five more wins in a row, three of them against the Giants. That closed the gap to 4 1/2, but the Giants were still 84% favorites. The Braves reeled off another 15-4 stretch while the Giants collapsed, going 6-12, so that by Sept. 16 it was the Braves who had a four-game lead and were 93% favorites. But the Giants weren't done, to their credit, and they rallied themselves over the next two weeks to get back into a tie with three games to go. The Braves had three games at home with Rockies; the Giants were in Los Angeles. They both won on Friday. They both won on Saturday. After the Braves won on Sunday, though, the Giants couldn't keep pace, losing to the Dodgers in a 12-1 rout that completed their collapse.

  • August 24, 1995: The California Angels were 56-33 on August 2 and had the seond-best record in baseball, trailing only the Cleveland Indians. By August 24, after three weeks of .500 ball, their record was 67-44, still good enough to hold an 8 1/2-game lead on the Rangers for the AL West title, and an 11-game bulge over the Brewers, the best of the wild-card contenders outside the West. In the simulator, the Angels went on to win the division 99.6% of the time; 0.3% of the time, they made the wild card, giving them a 99.9% chance at the playoffs. From there until the 13th of September, the Angels went just 5-13; but such was their prior lead that they still held a five-game edge in their divison (over the Mariners, now) and a 5 1/2 game lead over the next possible wild-card team, the Yankees. They still showed a 99% chance of making the playoffs, as there were just 15 games left in the season. They didn't have to right the ship, not completely; the odds were against both the Yankees and Mariners getting hot, right?

    Well, the odds may have been against it, but it happened anyway. The Yankees went 13-3 the rest of the way, and the Mariners went 12-4. The Angels wound up losing nine games in a row, but came back to win six of their last seven to force a tie with the Mariners. In the playoff game, Randy Johnson and Mark Langston staged a classic pitchers' duel for six innings, with Johnson and the M's holding a 1-0 lead, before Langston tired in the seventh. The Mariners scored four in the seventh and added four more in the eighth, Johnson wound up with a three-hit, 12-K gem, and Seattle ran away with a 9-1 victory to make the '95 Angels the team closest to the 100% mark to spend October watching the postseason on TV.

Clay Davenport is an author of Baseball Prospectus. You can contact Clay by clicking here or click here to see Clay's other articles.

Monday, October 3, 2005


Cavaliers last spring...Indians this fall. One game short...two games short. Great run...bad ending both times.

Friday, September 30, 2005

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Cleveland Sports Torture knows that you care about how your personal information is used and shared, and we take your privacy very seriously. Please read the following to learn more about our privacy policy. By visiting our website, you are accepting the practices outlined in this Privacy Policy.
This Privacy Policy covers Cleveland Sports Torture 's treatment of personal information that Cleveland Sports Torture gathers when you are on the Cleveland Sports Torture website and when you use Cleveland Sports Torture services. This policy does not apply to the practices of third parties that Cleveland Sports Torture does not own or control, or to individuals that Cleveland Sports Torture does not employ or manage.

Information Collected by Cleveland Sports Torture
We only collect personal information that is relevant to the purpose of our website. This information allows us to provide you with a customized and efficient experience. We do not process this information in a way that is incompatible with this objective. We collect the following types of information from our Cleveland Sports Torture users:
1. Information You Provide to Us: We receive and store any information you enter on our website or provide to us in any other way. You can choose not to provide us with certain information, but then you may not be able to take advantage of many of our special features.
2. Automatic Information:
o We receive and store certain types of information whenever you interact with us. Cleveland Sports Torture and its authorized agents automatically receive and record certain "traffic data" on their server logs from your browser including your IP address, Cleveland Sports Torture cookie information, and the page you requested. Cleveland Sports Torture uses this traffic data to help diagnose problems with its servers, analyze trends and administer the website.
o Cleveland Sports Torture may collect and, on any page, display the total counts that page has been viewed.
o Many companies offer programs that help you to visit websites anonymously. While Cleveland Sports Torture will not be able to provide you with a personalized experience if we cannot recognize you, we want you to be aware that these programs are available.

E-mail Communications
Cleveland Sports Torture is very concerned about your privacy and we will never provide your email address to a third party without your explicit permission, as detailed in the "Sharing Your Information" section below. Cleveland Sports Torture may send out e-mails with Cleveland Sports Torture -related news, products, offers, surveys or promotions.
Cookies are alphanumeric identifiers that we transfer to your computer's hard drive through your Web browser to enable our systems to recognize your browser and tell us how and when pages in our website are visited and by how many people. Cleveland Sports Torture cookies do not collect personal information, and we do not combine information collected through cookies with other personal information to tell us who you are or what your screen name or e-mail address is.
The "help" portion of the toolbar on the majority of browsers will direct you on how to prevent your browser from accepting new cookies, how to command the browser to tell you when you receive a new cookie, or how to fully disable cookies. We recommend that you leave the cookies activated because cookies allow you to use some of Cleveland Sports Torture 's coolest features.
Cleveland Sports Torture 's advertising partners may place a cookie on your browser that makes it possible to collect anonymous non-personally identifiable information that ad delivery systems use to present more relevant ads.  If you would prefer to opt-out of this standard practice, please visit our advertising partner Platform-A's privacy policy and opt-out page.

Sharing Your Information
Rest assured that we neither rent nor sell your personal information to anyone and that we will share your personal information only as described below.
Cleveland Sports Torture Personnel: Cleveland Sports Torture personnel and authorized consultants and/or contractors may have access to user information if necessary in the normal course of Cleveland Sports Torture business.
Business Transfers: In some cases, we may choose to buy or sell assets. In these types of transactions, user information is typically one of the business assets that is transferred. Moreover, if Cleveland Sports Torture, or substantially all of its assets, were acquired, user information would be one of the assets that is transferred.

Protection of Cleveland Sports Torture and Others: We may release personal information when we believe in good faith that release is necessary to comply with a law; to enforce or apply our Terms of Use and other policies; or to protect the rights, property, or safety of Cleveland Sports Torture, our employees, our users, or others. This includes exchanging information with other companies and organizations for fraud protection and credit risk reduction.
Syndication: Cleveland Sports Torture allows for the RSS syndication of all of its public content within the Cleveland Sports Torture website.
With Your Consent: Except as noted above, we will contact you when your personal information is shared with third parties or used for a purpose incompatible with the purpose(s) for which it was originally collected, and you will be able to opt out to prevent the sharing of this information.

Children Under 18 Years of Age
You must be 13 years and older to register to use the Cleveland Sports Torture website. As a result, Cleveland Sports Torture does not specifically collect information about children. If we learn that Cleveland Sports Torture has collected information from a child under the age of 13, we will delete that information as quickly as possible. We recommend that minors between the ages of 13 and 18 ask and receive their parents' permission before using Cleveland Sports Torture or sending information about themselves or anyone else over the Internet.

Changes to this Privacy Policy
Cleveland Sports Torture may amend this Privacy Policy from time to time, at its sole discretion. Use of information we collect now is subject to the Privacy Policy in effect at the time such information is used. If we make changes to the Privacy Policy, we will notify you by posting an announcement on the Cleveland Sports Torture website so you are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances if any, it is disclosed.

Conditions of Use
If you decide to visit Cleveland Sports Torture website, your visit and any possible dispute over privacy is subject to this Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use, including limitations on damages, arbitration of disputes, and application of California state law.

Effective Date of this Privacy Policy
This Privacy Policy is effective as of Cleveland Sports Torture and last updated 08/07/2010.